Use case · IT implementation
Systems and integrations rolled out in phases, with dependencies on the client’s own people for access, data and sign-off. Changes come from both sides.
Phase two cannot start until the client’s IT team provides the SSO configuration. It is three weeks late. Meanwhile the client asks to add a second region to the rollout. Both change the plan, neither is written down as such, and the go-live date is now a matter of opinion.
With Cohivo
Phases, environments, what the client provides and the go-live date become scope statements and the baseline.
The second region arrives as a change request; incidents, decisions and sign-offs have their own kinds. Client-owed dependencies are tracked with needed-by dates.
The region is priced and scheduled against the team’s availability; the dependency check shows what the late SSO configuration is holding up.
The client approves the change at the proposal version; decision requests to the client are recorded, not buried in a status call.
Baseline v2 carries the new region; the plan is updated after your approval; the audit log shows who agreed to what.
Blocked predecessors, overdue client dependencies and risks raise findings with evidence; the client report has a “What we need from you” section.
Helios Data Platform
Successor work cannot start until the predecessor clears
Evidence
High confidence · Rule inputs are complete
Proposed action
Needs approvalRe-plan "Cutover" start
Sample workspace, analysed by the real rules engine.
Guided pilot for agencies and consultancies of about 10–100 people. One email when your spot opens.